At the beginning, the narrator -- the same actor that voices Cogsworth, incidentally -- give us the back story. A young spoiled prince laughs at an old woman when she offers him a rose in return for shelter. She turns into an enchantress and curses him to become a beast, and enchants the entire household as well. The rose is magic: it will bloom until the prince turns 21, at which point he better have found his soul mate.

Okay, I'm good so far.
After awhile, we get into the movie. We get to know Belle and her father, are annoyed with Gaston, and charmed by Lumière.
We reach the high point of the movie (musically speaking, at least) when we watch the dishes present their "culinary cabaret," Be Our Guest.
This is where my problem arises. If you skip ahead in this video to 2:20, you might see what I mean.
Ten years we've been rusting,
Needing so much more than dusting.
Needing exercise, a chance to use our skills.
So they've been clocks and candelabras and teapots for 10 years. Got it.
Wait, that means the prince was only 11 when the spell was cast on him and the household. You can see why I think that might be a bit of a problem:
(1) Why is an 11-year-old opening the door late at night to a stranger?
(2) Where were/are his parents?
(3) Didn't the enchantress overreact just a bit? I mean, he's only 11, after all. It's not like he's supposed to be able to recognize inner beauty at that age. Heck, a lot of 21-year-olds still don't know what it is.
And regardless of the prince's age, how does the kingdom just completely forget that there's a prince in a castle only half a league away? That just doesn't jibe with common sense.
Does anyone else have a problem with any of this? Or am I seriously overthinking it? (Kellie, you don't count, because I know you have underlying and fundamental issues with the story as a whole, not necessarily this adaptation or smaller nuances.)


